JuriCIV: Business law and arbitration

An Open Law Africa programme project. A collaboration between Laws.Africa and the Côte d'Ivoire Bar Association.

JuriCIV logo
AfricanLII Laws.Africa

Mon JuriCIV

Votre espace de recherche personnel — enregistrez des documents, ajoutez des notes et recevez des mises à jour en cas de changement de législation.

Jugements récents

Résultats. trouvé(s).

  • Human Rights
    • — Provisional Measures — Urgency and Irreparable Harm — Preventive Relief Not Warranted Absent Real Risk and Evidence
    • — Extradition/Detention — Provisional Measures Cannot Decide Merits — Requests Inseparable From Substantive Issues
  • Jurisdiction — Prima Facie Competence — Effect of Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration — Applications Filed Before Entry Into Force Not Affected
6 juillet 2026
  • Human Rights — Provisional Measures — Extreme Gravity, Urgency and Irreparable Harm Required — Provisional Measures Must Not Prejudice Merits — Protocol art. 27(2); Rules art. 59(1)
6 juillet 2026
Court had prima facie jurisdiction but refused provisional measures because they would prejudge the merits.
  • Human Rights Access to Court Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration Prima facie jurisdiction and timing of withdrawal Provisional measures Prejudice to the merits
6 juillet 2026
  • Human Rights
    • — Jurisdiction — Prima facie jurisdiction to entertain applications filed before Article 34(6) withdrawal takes effect — African Charter / ICCPR
    • — Provisional Measures — Suspension or delay of withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration — Whether such measures would prejudge the merits
6 juillet 2026
Requête pour droits de fonctionnaire rejetée pour prescription; la nationalité des avocats n'empêche pas la représentation.
  • Droit administratif — Contentieux du travail — Prescription triennale des actions
  • Droit procédural — Représentation — Qualification des conseils après retrait d'un État — Règles de libre exercice dans l'espace UEMOA
  • Compétence — Cour communautaire — Litiges entre institutions communautaires et leurs agents
25 juin 2026
  • Administrative Law
    • — Civil Service Litigation — Jurisdiction of ECOWAS Court over disputes between Community institutions and officials — Protocol A/SP.1/01/05
    • — Prescription — Three‑year limitation for actions against Community institutions — Effect of administrative silence and exhaustion of internal remedies
  • Civil Procedure — Admissibility — Standing of counsel registered in a withdrawn Member State — Recognition via UEMOA practice rights
25 juin 2026
  • Human Rights
    • — Standing — Organisations’ victim status and interest to sue — Article 10(d) Protocol A/SP.1/01/05
    • — Jurisdiction — Application of domestic law that impedes enjoyment of rights under ratified instruments — Article 9 Protocol A/SP.1/01/05
  • Regional Law — Community obligations — Locus standi for alleged breaches of ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance — Article 10(a) Protocol A/SP.1/01/05
25 juin 2026
ECOWAS Court: NGOs lacked victim status and standing to challenge a national amnesty; application inadmissible.
  • Human Rights Amnesty Right to effective remedy and judicial protection Review of national measures affecting rights
  • Jurisdiction ECOWAS Court Competence to examine application/implementation of national law vis2vis international human rights instruments
  • Admissibility Standing of NGOs Victim status required for petitions under Article 10(d) of the Supplementary Protocol
25 juin 2026
Révision rejetée : le requérant n'a pas établi un fait nouveau de nature décisive requis pour la révision.
  • Droits de l'homme — Procédure — Révision d'arrêt — Découverte d'un fait nouveau d'influence décisive (Article 25 Protocole A/P.1/07/91)
  • Procédure civile — Recevabilité — Recours extraordinaire — Conditions de la révision et délais de trois mois / cinq ans
  • Droit communautaire — Compétence — Compétence de la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO à connaître des demandes en révision
25 juin 2026
ECOWAS Court confirms strict test for revision: new, decisive facts unknown to both Court and applicant are required.
  • Human Rights — Revision of Judgment — Application for revision based on newly discovered facts under Article 25 Protocol A/P.1/07/91 — Requirements and scope
  • Civil Procedure — Admissibility — Temporal and substantive criteria for revision — Three‑month discovery rule and five‑year outer limit
25 juin 2026
Voir plus de jugements