Jugements

Explore 4 405 court judgments.

Aide

Recherche avancée

All judgments

Browse the full collection.

Juridictions

Browse judgments by court or tribunal.

Juges

Browse judges and their decisions.

Indexes and collections

Explore specialist collections and indexes.

Find the law from what you know

Explore by court.

Juridictions

Browse judgments by court or level of court.

View all courts

Jugements récents

Latest judgment: 6 juillet 2026

Makhlouf C. République Tunisienne (003/2026) [2026] AfCHPR 9 (6 juillet 2026) Human Rights — Provisional Measures — Urgency and Irreparable Harm — Preventive Relief Not Warranted Absent Real Risk and Evidence — Extradition/Detention — Provisional Measures Cannot Decide Merits — Requests Inseparable From Substantive Issues Jurisdiction — Prima Facie Competence — Effect of Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration — Applications Filed Before Entry Into Force Not Affected	6 juillet 2026
Makhlouf v Republic of Tunisia (003/2026) [2026] AfCHPR 9 (6 July 2026) Human Rights — Provisional Measures — Extreme Gravity, Urgency and Irreparable Harm Required — Provisional Measures Must Not Prejudice Merits — Protocol art. 27(2); Rules art. 59(1)	6 juillet 2026
Belgeith v Republique Tunisienne (Requete No. 004/2025) [2026] AfCHPR 13 (6 juillet 2026) Court had prima facie jurisdiction but refused provisional measures because they would prejudge the merits. Human Rights Access to Court Withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration Prima facie jurisdiction and timing of withdrawal Provisional measures Prejudice to the merits	6 juillet 2026
Belgeith v Republic of Tunisia (Application No. 004/2025) [2026] AfCHPR 13 (6 July 2026) Human Rights — Jurisdiction — Prima facie jurisdiction to entertain applications filed before Article 34(6) withdrawal takes effect — African Charter / ICCPR — Provisional Measures — Suspension or delay of withdrawal of Article 34(6) Declaration — Whether such measures would prejudge the merits	6 juillet 2026
Diallo v Commission De La Cedeao (ECW/CCJ/APP/33/25; ECW/CCJ/JUD/35/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 21 (25 juin 2026) Requête pour droits de fonctionnaire rejetée pour prescription; la nationalité des avocats n'empêche pas la représentation. Droit administratif — Contentieux du travail — Prescription triennale des actions Droit procédural — Représentation — Qualification des conseils après retrait d'un État — Règles de libre exercice dans l'espace UEMOA Compétence — Cour communautaire — Litiges entre institutions communautaires et leurs agents	25 juin 2026
Diallo v ECOWAS Commission (ECW/CCJ/APP/33/25; ECW/CCJ/JUD/35/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 21 (25 June 2026) Administrative Law — Civil Service Litigation — Jurisdiction of ECOWAS Court over disputes between Community institutions and officials — Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 — Prescription — Three‑year limitation for actions against Community institutions — Effect of administrative silence and exhaustion of internal remedies Civil Procedure — Admissibility — Standing of counsel registered in a withdrawn Member State — Recognition via UEMOA practice rights	25 juin 2026
Mouvement Ivoirien Des Droits Humains and Others v I'Etat De Cote D'Ivoire (ECW/CCJ/APP/15/25; ECW/CCJ/JUD/37/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 20 (25 juin 2026) Human Rights — Standing — Organisations’ victim status and interest to sue — Article 10(d) Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 — Jurisdiction — Application of domestic law that impedes enjoyment of rights under ratified instruments — Article 9 Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 Regional Law — Community obligations — Locus standi for alleged breaches of ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance — Article 10(a) Protocol A/SP.1/01/05	25 juin 2026
Mouvement Ivoirien Des Droits Humains (Ivorian Human Rights Movement) and Others v Republic of Cote D'Ivoire (ECW/CCJ/APP/15/25; ECW/CCJ/JUD/37/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 20 (25 June 2026) ECOWAS Court: NGOs lacked victim status and standing to challenge a national amnesty; application inadmissible. Human Rights Amnesty Right to effective remedy and judicial protection Review of national measures affecting rights Jurisdiction ECOWAS Court Competence to examine application/implementation of national law vis2vis international human rights instruments Admissibility Standing of NGOs Victim status required for petitions under Article 10(d) of the Supplementary Protocol	25 juin 2026
Lacerda v I'Etat Du Cap-Vert (ECW/CCJ/APP/38/23/REV; ECW/CCJ/JUD/38/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 19 (25 juin 2026) Révision rejetée : le requérant n'a pas établi un fait nouveau de nature décisive requis pour la révision. Droits de l'homme — Procédure — Révision d'arrêt — Découverte d'un fait nouveau d'influence décisive (Article 25 Protocole A/P.1/07/91) Procédure civile — Recevabilité — Recours extraordinaire — Conditions de la révision et délais de trois mois / cinq ans Droit communautaire — Compétence — Compétence de la Cour de justice de la CEDEAO à connaître des demandes en révision	25 juin 2026
Lacerda v State of Cape Verde (ECW/CCJ/APP/38/23/REV; ECW/CCJ/JUD/38/26) [2026] ECOWASCJ 19 (25 June 2026) ECOWAS Court confirms strict test for revision: new, decisive facts unknown to both Court and applicant are required. Human Rights — Revision of Judgment — Application for revision based on newly discovered facts under Article 25 Protocol A/P.1/07/91 — Requirements and scope Civil Procedure — Admissibility — Temporal and substantive criteria for revision — Three‑month discovery rule and five‑year outer limit	25 juin 2026

Voir toutes les décisions